Legislative bodies in European Union law

Posted by on Jan 23, 2016 in European Union law

European Union law is a bit different from all other laws, and writing about all differences would take large amount of time. So, this article will be just about few things that are important regarding European Union Law. Check las vegas Car accident attorney page and search for more info.

    Out of all executive bodies in the EU, the European Commission is the main one. Objectives of this Commission are ( as written in articles of the treaty ): the promotion of general interests of the EU, remaining completely independent body that takes no instructions from any government. It also has the power to adopt Union legislative acts, but only those that follow the codes of Treaties. The Parliament of EU can suggest legislatives to Commission, and they can either adopt or discard those suggestions.  But, the Commission doesn’t have full power over legislatures because European Parliament as well as Council of the EU both have rights to amendments and vetos while the legislative process lasts.


   TO adopt an law, or legislature commission has to vote, and that law needs to have majority vote to pass. But before it comes to that all objections that come must be processes and only when no one has anything to object the vote can start.

   We talked about main legislative body, but you should be aware of the second legislative body, Council of the European Union. Council is composed out of ministers of all member states.  Another council, European Council is concerned with development of the council and it defines political directions and priorities of EU. On the other hand the Council does legislative functions. Council is interesting because representatives ( ministers) of the nations under the EU are different ministers. Well, if a Council is gathered to discuss foreign affairs then ministers of foreign affairs from each member state will attend that meeting, and it is always like that depending on the topic of the meeting.


   The voting within the Council is not made to favor greater nations, because it is done with inversiveweight to the size of the member. There is 352 votes on every meeting and every legislation requires majority vote which is decided for every legislature.

Read More »

Laws you might find funny

Posted by on Jan 23, 2016 in Crazy Laws

Each country has its own laws, most of them are essentially the same as in other countries, like punishment for theft or fraud, but the laws that make countries differ from each other can be very entertaining.

With this in mind, in this article we will mention the ones we find most interesting in the United States per state.

Connecticut law

Some kids in school don’t like letting other kids copy their work during homework or tests but the state of Connecticut has taken it to a whole new level. Connecticut has issued a law that prohibits students from selling a term paper, dissertation, essay and so on in any educational facility supervised by the state. Some of you probably watched the movie Lord of the rings and witnessed the scene where Aragorn is Tossing Gimli, well, In Florida, if owners of the stores where alcohol is stored participate in or permit any contest of Dwarf tossing they will be fined a thousand dollars.

If you’re a llama professional and you’ve had troubles because spectators got hurt during your show, move to Georgia. Llama professionals in Georgia are not accounted for any injuries that might occur to people who come to goof around the county fair unless they were standing in the authorized area.

In Hawaii, all billboards, with a few exceptions are prohibited. This law was issued in order to make the place more beautiful.If you want to know more about orange county Criminal defense lawyer please visit our page.

The only stated that declared cannibalism illegal is Idaho fearing that people might start eating other people in purpose of rituals and the law is very strict, threatening up to 14 years of prison. However, if in a life or death situation a person willingly eats another person who has already died in order to survive, this law has no effect.

Read More »

Lawyers from the point of view of one judge

Posted by on Jan 23, 2016 in Lawyers

How to generally address to lawyers from the perspective of a judge? What to publish on the blog of the profession, which is clearly not dying for new judges’ attitudes and opinions, and how not to sound pretentious and overly apologetic? Visit Criminal attorneys long beach for help.

As a judge, I usually write about the judiciary. The conditions in which it was established, (not) able to be built as an independent branch of government, the causes of the condition in which it is today … But what about the legal profession? Can the judiciary and fighting for the judicial authorities to speak seriously if analysis does not include the second most important factor in the equation called justice? Finally, if there is any underlying causes of domination of methods that observe these undoubtedly dependent, regularly variations and describes them separately?

KAVANAGH Q.C. ÔThe End of LawÕ ITV, Wednesday 25 April at 8pm John Thaw returns in a one-off special two-hour film of KAVANAGH Q.C. When the body of a beautiful young Hungarian computer science graduate is discovered in a London hotel bathroom, middle-aged businessman Harry Hatton (Robert Pickavance) denies murder, though the body was found in his hotel room. His defence Sarah Swithen (Samantha Bond) Ð opposed by Jeremy Aldermarten (Nicholas Jones) - fails to stop a guilty verdict. But urged on by HattonÕs daughter Alison (Susannah Wise), Sarah starts to prepare grounds for an appeal, seeking advice from Kavanagh. Guest stars in the two-hour drama, include Samantha Bond, Tim Pigott-Smith, Nicholas Le Prevost, Larry Lamb, Barbara Leigh-Hunt and Susannah Wise. Oliver Ford Davies as Peter Foxcott; Nicholas Jones as vain bachelor Jeremy Aldermarten, and Cliff Parisi as River CourtÕs all-powerful senior clerk Tom Buckley. Pictured: Samantha Bond as Sarah Swithen For further information please contact the Carlton Television Picture Desk: PAT SMITH 020 7615 1622 JOHN MANTHORPE 020 7615 1614 LOUISE SMITH 0115 964 5592 This photograph is the copyright of Carlton Television and may only be reproduced for editorial purposes relating to Carlton and the programme(s) or announcement(s) to which the photograph relates.

In these reflections, likewise a student in fear of getting the least saved and the worst learnt lessons, during the test when he exposes insufficiently understood controversy, so do I, driven by irrational force and not sufficiently prepared for a tricky subject, choose the writing on the legal profession and its relation to the judiciary and lawyers .And finally how to respond to the most difficult questions: How to satisfy justice?

Being a successful lawyer sometimes means finding loopholes and in that way save your client. Therefore a good lawyer doesn’t mean a just full one but resourceful one. And that is the main problem of our system. Although the main purpose of law is to satisfy the justice sometimes people take it for nothing less than just a job.

During the decades of workers’ self-management, advocacy is kept hushed as a spirit of reactions and some kind of latent civil resistance. Being a lawyer is usually meant being different … Potential “traitor”, an intellectual – troublemaker, the person in which house you have to whisper.

Although many people will say that they will do anything for money, we can’t say that this is the truthful statement. Otherwise their job is very difficult because they are always separated between their client and justice.

Read More »